There was once a man who lived in a shoe...no, just kidding.
Okay, seriously, there was once a man who wrote a full stage play and saved up $12,000 to rent a theater, produce the show and promote it. It failed miserably. During its opening weekend a lonely, combined total of 30 people attended. The unfathomable flop left him penniless, broken and homeless. For six years, he worked odd jobs, sleeping in his car most nights, and relied on other people for food and money. Instead of paying for the basic human essentials - shelter, food and clothing - he saved every penny he earned in efforts towards reproducing the same show that flopped worse than any show should EVER flop. Question: would you consider his post-failure choice of course stupid or positively sacrificial? On one hand, here is a dream-driven man that has absolutely nothing except his dream and a questionable talent, and is reinvesting the little money he makes into attempting to turn his dream into a profitable reality. On the other hand here is a man that is so blindsided by his preset goals, that it looks as if he will probably die broke and unsuccessful.
Right?
Fact: The above scenario is a true story. His name is Tyler Perry,
who is known today as one of the most successful original stage play producers in US history.
Halle Berry, Kelsey Grammer, Jim Carey and Musiq Soulchild have all been in similar situations before they became stars. Since hindsight is 20/20, we, the outsiders looking in, would label their actions as sacrificial. But what about the one insider that is always looking out? Each of them undoubtedly saw every hunger pain, bitter cold night and shameless plea for help as a sacrifice towards a brighter future. So how do we label the other playwrights, actors and singers that have not yet acquired international acclaim, million-dollar homes and custom Bentleys?
How do we label the blossoming movers and shakers that are still in the struggle, who instead of six years, have been homeless for ten? Are we to encourage them or criticize their current choice of lifestyles? Simply put, what identifies the hair-thin line between sacrifice and stupidity?
In this business we call entertainment, it is far from uncommon for the starry-eyed dreamer to choose flashiness over food. It is a chronic condition amongst the not-so-rich-and-almost-famous demographic called, Broke Fabulousity. This is when a gray area is formed between the black and white worlds of needs versus desires, thus becoming needs versus needs. It is when you make a conscious decision between an eviction-pending rent payment and a Grammy Awards show ticket, between your about-to-get-repossessed car note and a trip to Olympus Fashion Week or between a very necessary student loan payment and a new outfit for the biggest party of the year.
Hollywood is not a town for the talker, talk is not merely enough. It is a place for the walker that understands the ironic need for un-needed amenities. It is a place where people make split-second assumptions on your credibility based on your outer appearance. How many times have you assumed that the person you saw in a three piece suit, stepping out of a Benz in front of the Four Seasons holding a Blackberry was someone of importance? How do you know that he isn’t a struggling music manager without job that landed a once-in-a-lifetime lunch meeting with the CEO of Universal? The suit overdrew his checking account, the car was a rental and the Blackberry set him back weeks ago. Is he to be called stupid for overspending or is he sacrificing for his career? The car, the suit, the phone, they all project the image of a credible manager.
Rest assured, appearing fabulous while being broke is a dangerous gamble. It is a risky game of 50/50 that is constantly being played by Hollywood hopefuls in efforts to win the top prize – success. To them, not to sacrifice would be ridiculous because it will always be an issue of needs versus needs. Their career is their life. It is just as important as the roof over their head and the clothes on their back. But since success cannot be purchased on eBay or whipped up in the kitchen with one of grandma’s secret recipes, when and where is the line drawn between sacrifice and stupidity? What is to be considered too much or too far? That is a limit that only the dreamer can measure.
Okay, seriously, there was once a man who wrote a full stage play and saved up $12,000 to rent a theater, produce the show and promote it. It failed miserably. During its opening weekend a lonely, combined total of 30 people attended. The unfathomable flop left him penniless, broken and homeless. For six years, he worked odd jobs, sleeping in his car most nights, and relied on other people for food and money. Instead of paying for the basic human essentials - shelter, food and clothing - he saved every penny he earned in efforts towards reproducing the same show that flopped worse than any show should EVER flop. Question: would you consider his post-failure choice of course stupid or positively sacrificial? On one hand, here is a dream-driven man that has absolutely nothing except his dream and a questionable talent, and is reinvesting the little money he makes into attempting to turn his dream into a profitable reality. On the other hand here is a man that is so blindsided by his preset goals, that it looks as if he will probably die broke and unsuccessful.
Right?
Fact: The above scenario is a true story. His name is Tyler Perry,
who is known today as one of the most successful original stage play producers in US history.Halle Berry, Kelsey Grammer, Jim Carey and Musiq Soulchild have all been in similar situations before they became stars. Since hindsight is 20/20, we, the outsiders looking in, would label their actions as sacrificial. But what about the one insider that is always looking out? Each of them undoubtedly saw every hunger pain, bitter cold night and shameless plea for help as a sacrifice towards a brighter future. So how do we label the other playwrights, actors and singers that have not yet acquired international acclaim, million-dollar homes and custom Bentleys?
How do we label the blossoming movers and shakers that are still in the struggle, who instead of six years, have been homeless for ten? Are we to encourage them or criticize their current choice of lifestyles? Simply put, what identifies the hair-thin line between sacrifice and stupidity?
In this business we call entertainment, it is far from uncommon for the starry-eyed dreamer to choose flashiness over food. It is a chronic condition amongst the not-so-rich-and-almost-famous demographic called, Broke Fabulousity. This is when a gray area is formed between the black and white worlds of needs versus desires, thus becoming needs versus needs. It is when you make a conscious decision between an eviction-pending rent payment and a Grammy Awards show ticket, between your about-to-get-repossessed car note and a trip to Olympus Fashion Week or between a very necessary student loan payment and a new outfit for the biggest party of the year.Hollywood is not a town for the talker, talk is not merely enough. It is a place for the walker that understands the ironic need for un-needed amenities. It is a place where people make split-second assumptions on your credibility based on your outer appearance. How many times have you assumed that the person you saw in a three piece suit, stepping out of a Benz in front of the Four Seasons holding a Blackberry was someone of importance? How do you know that he isn’t a struggling music manager without job that landed a once-in-a-lifetime lunch meeting with the CEO of Universal? The suit overdrew his checking account, the car was a rental and the Blackberry set him back weeks ago. Is he to be called stupid for overspending or is he sacrificing for his career? The car, the suit, the phone, they all project the image of a credible manager.
Rest assured, appearing fabulous while being broke is a dangerous gamble. It is a risky game of 50/50 that is constantly being played by Hollywood hopefuls in efforts to win the top prize – success. To them, not to sacrifice would be ridiculous because it will always be an issue of needs versus needs. Their career is their life. It is just as important as the roof over their head and the clothes on their back. But since success cannot be purchased on eBay or whipped up in the kitchen with one of grandma’s secret recipes, when and where is the line drawn between sacrifice and stupidity? What is to be considered too much or too far? That is a limit that only the dreamer can measure.


